#Mind lock the zeitgeist movement movie

#Mind lock the zeitgeist movement movie

I find it funny, because I'm certain the person who made this movie believes in: a better world, is helplessly trying to be a revolutionary and is arguing with what is concluded to be exactitude. There are several ways to note this: lack of social contact, political abstinence, corrupt moral values. Also people who seek change show typical dissatisfaction. It sadly is like that, there are norms, social order and an established codes of behavior. If you're with monkeys, learn to live like one. One thing to know: What is an Intelligent Person? Well to me it is a person who can adapt to it's surroundings. You can't just blame a system for your misfortune. First of all, no organization in the world can fully understand the functioning of the world or even capitalism itself, because it is an imperfect system, with flaws, like everything else. I am quite certain that you people 'are aware' that a movie as this is a load of infantilism, lies, conspiracy ideas and allegoric theories that claim that there is a superior force controlling the world. Not that I am entitled to hurt the feeling of you people who believe in these two 'haphazardous motion pictures'. In this time I could have made around $64 working. So I've just wasted about 4 hours including pauses watching the zeitgeist movies on youtube.

'A Load of Trash' and A Sequel! 'The Added Trash' I think the article would be much more coherent if we consistently refereed to zeitgeist as an organization because thats really all this article is making reference to. However, it seems that the article is actually about a centralized organization and not a movement following it, as the article dogmatically references an official website, and the second sentence even claims that the movement defines itself as a 'sustainability advocacy organization.' Furthermore social movements tend not to have things like official logos or central websites - those are elements of an organization. The first sentence of the lead claims that this is a grass roots movement which would indicate a sort of bottom up spontaneous movement that is independent of central organization. Im having difficulty with this page because the subject isnt really consistently defined.

24 More false accusations of 'vandalism'.23 neutrality-delete?honeypot - who cares= delete.21 The second sentence of the Philosophy section.16 This article is constantly vandalized.15 misrepresentation of the topic and eating up the article edit by edit.14 Wikipedia articles are sourced from third-party reliable sources.13 'Skeptic Project' flamers need to stop trolling this page.12 This page reads like an advertisement.11 Article does not explain what movement is.10 Article is part of a Zeitgeist profile-raising and advertising campaign.9 Peter Joseph on 'Russia Today' Sept 14th '11.6 What happened to the criticism section.5 Censorship and biased opposing editors.2 'A Load of Trash' and A Sequel! 'The Added Trash'.1 Is this a movement or an organization?.